News

NFFN calls for Countryside Stewardship rollover

England
climate action
Crops
Environmental Land Management scheme
Government
policy

Without options, farmers whose funding ends may remove habitat and return land to food production, setting back nature’s recovery.

The NFFN is urging the Government to allow farmers to roll over their agreements so they are not left without an agri-environment scheme after this year.

Across England, thousands of farmers may be forced to bring land set aside for nature back into crop production when their Countryside Stewardship (CS) agreements end on December 31. This would seriously undermine efforts to restore nature, halt species decline by 2030 - a legally binding target - and tackle climate change.

While most farmers in the CS Mid Tier should eventually find suitable options within the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), the scheme is not due to reopen for applications until next year. Many farmers in the old Higher Tier are also at risk of being excluded, as the new higher-level CS - part of the Environmental Land Management schemes (ELMs) - will initially operate on an invite-only basis. 

With arable farmers in particular operating on tight margins, there is real concern that those shut out of the new Higher Tier will have no choice but to plough up valuable habitat to grow more crops simply to generate enough income to make ends meet.  

The NFFN says the Government must act quickly to ensure no farmer currently funded for environmental outcomes is left without a way to continue.

Our CEO Martin Lines said: “ The Government has failed to provide a joined-up approach to moving farmers into new agreements, leaving an enormous gap that now needs bridging. Fortunately, there is still time for ministers to act. A one-year rollover agreement for CS farmers would provide the badly needed confidence.

Once farmers leave agri-environment schemes, it is highly unlikely they will return as trust will be broken

Martin Lines

“Farmers have been put in a very difficult position with no certainty. There is plenty of talk about ‘public money for public goods’, but in practice funding has been reduced and application windows have been unclear.

“Once farmers leave agri-environment schemes, it is highly unlikely they will return as trust will be broken.”

Investing in nature-friendly farming is vital for the future. This is not just about tackling climate change and restoring nature. With heatwaves and droughts already hitting farms hard, food security and the long-term viability of farm businesses also depend on moving to low-input systems that work with nature rather than against it.

Martin urges farmers to view the environmental benefits of schemes like CS not just as extra income, but as essential to preparing their businesses for current and future challenges. 

He added: “We need farming that focuses on soil health, biodiversity and reducing costs. This isn’t just about money -  it’s about building resilience in both our landscape and our businesses.

“Farmers play a crucial role in managing water, protecting habitats and boosting biodiversity. Nature-friendly farming can also cut many of the core costs tied to environmental management. 

“We need the right support that both recognises the benefits of nature-friendly farming and ensures every penny of public money is spent as effectively as possible.”

The NFFN is encouraging farmers who are at risk of losing their funding by the end of the year to share their stories with local media. Those who would like support with this can contact us at press@nffn.co.uk

Cookie consent

We use cookies on this website to improve your experience, provide social media features, and analyse our traffic. By clicking Accept All, you agree to the use of cookies as outlined in our Cookie & Privacy Policy. You can manage your cookie preferences at any time by clicking Cookie Settings.